What do Fidelity Raters score?
They score product fidelity: whether a generated visual still accurately represents the reference product, checking logos, buttons, and patterns in fashion, or ingredients, portions, and packaging in food.
:no_upscale():format(webp))
:no_upscale():format(webp))
Step 1
Identifies the details in your original product image that need to stay consistent in the generated visual.
Step 2
Fashion Rater looks at details like color, patterns, logos and buttons, while Food Rater checks ingredients, portions and packaging.
Step 3
Every output receives a fidelity score based on how accurately it represents the original product.
Step 4
Outputs above your threshold move forward. Anything below it can automatically go to Visual Fix for another attempt, or be isolated for manual review.
:no_upscale():format(webp))
:no_upscale():format(webp))
If AI is creating or transforming fashion or food images across your catalog, the risk isn't a bad-looking output, it's a good-looking one that's quietly wrong: a changed logo, a swapped ingredient, a different portion size. Fidelity Raters catch that before it reaches your customers.
:no_upscale():format(webp))
If someone on your team still checks AI-edited images by hand to confirm the product itself didn't change, Fidelity Raters automate that check, so review time goes to the outputs that actually need a person, not every single one.
If your brand needs certain overlays, labels, or packaging details treated differently from a generic ruleset, Fidelity Raters can be tuned to your requirements instead of flagging what you actually want kept.
:no_upscale():format(webp))